Difference between revisions of "SURF discussions, Jan 2014"

From Murray Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|
|
==== 27 Jan (Mon) ====
==== 27 Jan (Mon) ====
* 9:00: Open
* 9:00: Anton, Vipul and Clare


* 11:00: Open
* 11:00: Open
* 11:30: Open
* 11:30: Juan and Ioannis
|
|


==== 28 Jan (Tue) ====
==== 28 Jan (Tue) ====
* 13:00: Open
* 13:00: Robert and Yilin
* 13:30: Open
* 13:30: Pulkit, Clare and Vipul
* 14:00: Open
* 14:00: Open
* 14:30: Open
|
|


==== 29 Jan (Wed) ====
==== 29 Jan (Wed) ====
* 9:30: Open
* 9:30: Mattias Fält and Vasu Raman


* 12:00: Open
* 12:00: Linnea Persson and Scott Livingston


* 17:30: Open
|}
|}


The agenda for the phone call is (roughly):
The agenda for the phone call is (roughly):


# Description of the basic idea behind the project (based on applicant's understanding)
# Student: Description of the basic idea behind the project (based on students's understanding)
# Discussion about approaches, things to read, variations to consider, etc
# All: Discussion about approaches, things to read, variations to consider, etc
# Discussion of the format of the proposal
# Mentor/co-mentor: Discussion of the format of the proposal
# Questions and discussion about the process
# Student: Questions and discussion about the process

Latest revision as of 18:29, 24 January 2014

Slots for talking with applicants and co-mentors about SURF projects. Please sign up for one of the slots below. All times are PST.

27 Jan (Mon)

  • 9:00: Anton, Vipul and Clare
  • 11:00: Open
  • 11:30: Juan and Ioannis

28 Jan (Tue)

  • 13:00: Robert and Yilin
  • 13:30: Pulkit, Clare and Vipul
  • 14:00: Open
  • 14:30: Open

29 Jan (Wed)

  • 9:30: Mattias Fält and Vasu Raman
  • 12:00: Linnea Persson and Scott Livingston

The agenda for the phone call is (roughly):

  1. Student: Description of the basic idea behind the project (based on students's understanding)
  2. All: Discussion about approaches, things to read, variations to consider, etc
  3. Mentor/co-mentor: Discussion of the format of the proposal
  4. Student: Questions and discussion about the process