WASC 2005-04-13: Difference between revisions
From Murray Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Andrea, | {{wascheader}} | ||
Present: Marianne, Niles, Csilla, Josephine, Andrea, Brad, Jean, Richard | |||
Goals: | |||
* Talk about things we would like to see improved at Caltech | |||
* Decide what to put forward for WASC proposal | |||
=== Round Robin Discussion === | |||
<table width=100%><tr valign=top><td width=50%> | |||
* Very hard to change the core | |||
* Zero in on a small number of things and do them really well | |||
* Worried about results from the Princeton Review | |||
** Why do students feel this way | |||
** Can we figure out more to do about it | |||
* Culture of going to classes can be obnoxious | |||
** Try to figure out why students aren't coming to class | |||
** Sometimes homework sets are due; causes problems with classes | |||
* Issue of the core could be tricky | |||
* Underuniting of courses | |||
* Focus on the classroom experience; do students ask a lot of questions, is it a valuable learning experience | |||
<td width=50%> | |||
* Evenness of teaching quality | |||
* Teacher training | |||
* Incentives (salary, etc) | |||
* Grade inflation? | |||
* Gathering information for evaluation | |||
** Identify real problem areas | |||
** Salary incentives are probably not a great tool; rewards people who are doing well | |||
* How do we incentivize good teaching/"punish" bad teaching | |||
* How do we fit faculty to things they do well | |||
* Student health | |||
</table> | |||
=== Possible Report Topics (RMM) === | |||
Here is a first cut at collecting together topics (done in real-time, so not necessarily well thought out): | |||
* Quality of teaching | * Quality of teaching | ||
Line 30: | Line 64: | ||
* Content of the core | * Content of the core | ||
** Might be a very tricky one | ** Might be a very tricky one | ||
Latest revision as of 15:57, 21 April 2006
WASC Home |
Present: Marianne, Niles, Csilla, Josephine, Andrea, Brad, Jean, Richard
Goals:
- Talk about things we would like to see improved at Caltech
- Decide what to put forward for WASC proposal
Round Robin Discussion
|
|
Possible Report Topics (RMM)
Here is a first cut at collecting together topics (done in real-time, so not necessarily well thought out):
- Quality of teaching
- Feedback to faculty, including course evaluation (eg, how many hours do you spend)
- Tools for faculty (best practices, new technology)
- Orientation and mentoring for new teachers
- Focus on what students learn?
- Rewarding good teaching (incentives)
- Student workload issues
- Underuniting
- Homework, labs, exams, etc
- Some classes are overunited
- Possible things related to student health
- Overall undergraduate experience
- Try to evaluate the quality of Caltech education (above just teaching)
- Collect data about best practices in different divisions/options
- Classroom experience (across the variety of courses that students teach)
- Might touch on tools (eg, MATLAB), breadth of the core
- Look into student health? Compare to other universities
- Perhaps link to research and honor system topics
- Course attendance, classroom experience and *learning*
- Can we find out why students aren't coming to class
- Focus on what students learn?
- Content of the core
- Might be a very tricky one