EECI08: Implementation Examples: Difference between revisions

From Murray Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (EECI: Implementation Examples moved to EECI08: Implementation Examples)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


== Further Reading ==
== Further Reading ==
* <p>S. Waydo, J. Hauser, R. Bailey, E. Klavins, R.M. Murray, “UAV as a Reliable Wingman: A  
* <p>S. Waydo, J. Hauser, R. Bailey, E. Klavins, R.M. Murray, “UAV as a Reliable Wingman: A Flight Demonstration”, IEEE T. Control Systems Technology, 2007. </p>
Flight Demonstration”, IEEE T. Control Systems Technology, 2007. </p>
* <p>J. Burdick et al., “Sensing, Navigation and Reasoning Technologies for the DARPA Urban Challenge”, DARPA final report, 2007 (http://gc.caltech.edu/media/papers)</p>
* <p>J. Burdick et al., “Sensing, Navigation and Reasoning Technologies for the DARPA Urban  
Challenge”, DARPA final report, 2007 (http://gc.caltech.edu/media/papers)</p>

Latest revision as of 20:17, 1 March 2009

Prev: Lattice Theory Course home Next: Future Directions

In this lecture we present two examples of networked control systems that have been implemented on representative hardware. In the first example, we briefly consider a demonstration of the "lost wingman" protocol on a T-33 test aircraft acting as the wingman for a (human-piloted) F-15 aircraft. The controller is implemented using receding horizon control and CCL. In the second example we present the implementation and results of Caltech's entry in the 2007 DARPA Urban Challenge.

Lecture Materials

Further Reading

  • S. Waydo, J. Hauser, R. Bailey, E. Klavins, R.M. Murray, “UAV as a Reliable Wingman: A Flight Demonstration”, IEEE T. Control Systems Technology, 2007.

  • J. Burdick et al., “Sensing, Navigation and Reasoning Technologies for the DARPA Urban Challenge”, DARPA final report, 2007 (http://gc.caltech.edu/media/papers)