IEEE Paper, 18 Apr 05: Difference between revisions
(→Viscek) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Discussion of papers == | == Discussion of papers == | ||
<table border=1> | |||
<tr valign=top> | |||
<td> | |||
=== Viscek === | === Viscek === | ||
| Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
Some further work on crowd control (published in Nature) using similar tools (purely computational). | Some further work on crowd control (published in Nature) using similar tools (purely computational). | ||
<td> | |||
Takeaways for our paper | Takeaways for our paper | ||
* Early example of a protocol | * Early example of a protocol | ||
* Focused on alignment (common problem) | * Focused on alignment (common problem) | ||
<td> | |||
Related papers | Related papers | ||
* Jadbabaie | * Jadbabaie | ||
* Blondel et al (incorrect citation?) | * Blondel et al (incorrect citation?) | ||
<tr valign=top> | |||
<td> | |||
=== Tabuada === | === Tabuada === | ||
Currently at Notre Dame. Alex cited this in this thesis. Was done in the context of nonholonomic vehicle. What graphs would you set up to enable meaningful controls. Started with acyclic graphs. Paper was never accepted into a journal. | Currently at Notre Dame. Alex cited this in this thesis. Was done in the context of nonholonomic vehicle. What graphs would you set up to enable meaningful controls. Started with acyclic graphs. Paper was never accepted into a journal. | ||
<td> | |||
Takeaways for our paper | Takeaways for our paper | ||
* Might not cite this; '''Action (Demetri)''': look for follow up work (if any). If we can't find something more recent that is significant, probably won't include | * Might not cite this; '''Action (Demetri)''': look for follow up work (if any). If we can't find something more recent that is significant, probably won't include | ||
* Effects of dynamics (especially nonlinear) | * Effects of dynamics (especially nonlinear) | ||
<td> | |||
Related papers | Related papers | ||
* Naomi Leonard | * Naomi Leonard | ||
* '''Action (Richard)''': look for other papers on this topic | * '''Action (Richard)''': look for other papers on this topic | ||
<tr valign=top> | |||
<td> | |||
=== Fax === | |||
Would be nice to see more work in the area of performance and observer structure. Various follow-on results have not yet been followed up. Getting information from different sources (potentially at different times). | |||
'''Action (Alex)''': look at papers that cite this one (google scholar) and make sure we understand what further results have been achieved. | |||
<td> | |||
Takeaways for our work | |||
* Starting point for Laplacian | |||
<td> | |||
Related papers | |||
* Double graph model by Zhipu? | |||
<tr valign=top> | |||
<td> | |||
=== Olfati-Saber === | |||
We can use this paper for the basic definitions that we want to include. | |||
<td> | |||
Takeaways for our work | |||
* Basic problem definition | |||
<td> | |||
Related papers | |||
<tr valign=top> | |||
<td> | |||
=== Moreau === | === Moreau === | ||
* Admits nonlinear update laws | * Admits nonlinear update laws | ||
* Makes use of properties of stochastic matrices | * Makes use of properties of stochastic matrices | ||
<td> | |||
<td> | |||
</table> | |||
== New papers to consider == | == New papers to consider == | ||
| Line 46: | Line 83: | ||
=== "Protocols" for concensus and cooperation === | === "Protocols" for concensus and cooperation === | ||
* Distributed setting (doesn't require complete connectivity) | * Distributed setting (doesn't require complete connectivity) | ||
=== Laplacians and Graph Theory === | |||
* Introduce Laplacian by average consensus example | |||
== Agenda for next meeting == | == Agenda for next meeting == | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 18 April 2005
Agenda
- Discuss papers we came up with last time
- Add new papers to the list that we think we should read
- Include papers from ACC 2005
- Discuss common themes
- Set agenda for next meeting
Discussion of papers
ViscekThis is the paper that Ali cites and so everyone cites it. In the physics community, this is cited correctly. In controls, this paper is often credited with things that aren't really in the paper. Deals with alignment in flocking behavior. Position of agenda matters (who are your neighbors). Uses a completely nonlinear protocol as his alignment rule. Agents move with velocity v in the plane. Looks at effects of change in density and change in noise. Some further work on crowd control (published in Nature) using similar tools (purely computational). |
Takeaways for our paper
|
Related papers
|
TabuadaCurrently at Notre Dame. Alex cited this in this thesis. Was done in the context of nonholonomic vehicle. What graphs would you set up to enable meaningful controls. Started with acyclic graphs. Paper was never accepted into a journal. |
Takeaways for our paper
|
Related papers
|
FaxWould be nice to see more work in the area of performance and observer structure. Various follow-on results have not yet been followed up. Getting information from different sources (potentially at different times). Action (Alex): look at papers that cite this one (google scholar) and make sure we understand what further results have been achieved. |
Takeaways for our work
|
Related papers
|
Olfati-SaberWe can use this paper for the basic definitions that we want to include. |
Takeaways for our work
|
Related papers
|
Moreau
|
New papers to consider
Common themes
"Protocols" for concensus and cooperation
- Distributed setting (doesn't require complete connectivity)
Laplacians and Graph Theory
- Introduce Laplacian by average consensus example
Agenda for next meeting
Original plan:
- List tools
- Open problems
- Outline paper
Revised plan:
