Information for "If there is a common pole and zero (say at a) in the closed loop transfer function, should I say there's one pole at a and also one zero at a?"
From Murray Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Basic information
| Display title | If there is a common pole and zero (say at a) in the closed loop transfer function, should I say there's one pole at a and also one zero at a? |
| Default sort key | If there is a common pole and zero (say at a) in the closed loop transfer function, should I say there's one pole at a and also one zero at a? |
| Page length (in bytes) | 133 |
| Page ID | 2430 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Han (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 01:48, 1 December 2008 |
| Latest editor | Han (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 01:48, 1 December 2008 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
