Ncsbook/markjls - Revision history

Murray at 22:59, 31 July 2009

2009-07-31T22:59:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 31 July 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.		* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.
	:: I agree. --Vijay, 25 June		:: I agree. --Vijay, 25 June

			=== 30 Jul 09 telecon ===
			* Time horizon = N or T
			* Equation (4.3) uses t as an index; shift to i, j, etc
			* Need to reformat the equations to fit the text
			* Add a section to chapter 2 that summarizes LQG (after 2.7)
			* Watch out for \Pi conflicts with Ricatti operator

Murray at 16:01, 25 June 2009

2009-06-25T16:01:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 25 June 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.		* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.


	* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.		* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.
	:: I agree. --Vijay, 25 June		:: I agree. --Vijay, 25 June

Murray: /* RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 */

2009-06-25T16:00:42Z

RMM comments, 15 Jun 09

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 25 June 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.		* Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.

	:: As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation.		:: As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation. --Vijay, 25 June

	* Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)		* Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)

	* I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").		* I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").
	:: I am fine with not using MJLS.		:: I am fine with not using MJLS. --Vijay, 25 June

	* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.		* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.
Line 17:		Line 17:

	* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.		* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.
	:: I agree.		:: I agree. --Vijay, 25 June

Murray: /* RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 */

2009-06-25T15:59:55Z

RMM comments, 15 Jun 09

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 25 June 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.		* Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.

	*: As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation.		:: As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation.

	* Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)		* Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)

	* I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").		* I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").
	*: I am fine with not using MJLS.		:: I am fine with not using MJLS.

	* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.		* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.
Line 17:		Line 17:

	* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.		* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.
	*: I agree.		:: I agree.

Murray at 15:59, 25 June 2009

2009-06-25T15:59:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 25 June 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	=== RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 ===		=== RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 ===

	- Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.		* Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.

	As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation.		*: As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation.

	- Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)		* Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)

			* I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").
			*: I am fine with not using MJLS.

	~~- I would suggest that we don't use~~ the ~~acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system"~~. ~~The exception~~ would be if ~~you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system~~ (~~like we say "LTI"~~).		* The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.

	~~I am fine with not using MJLS~~.

	- The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.

			* Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.
	- Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.		*: I agree.

	I agree.

Vijay at 15:57, 25 June 2009

2009-06-25T15:57:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 25 June 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	=== RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 ===		=== RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 ===

	# Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.		- Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.
	# Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)
	# I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").		As I said in the call, subscripts will lead to subscripts of subscripts and subscripts of superscripts. Of course, if the standard is subscript, I will change my notation.
	# The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.
	# Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.		- Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)


			- I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").

			I am fine with not using MJLS.

			- The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.


			- Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.

			I agree.

Murray at 02:14, 17 June 2009

2009-06-17T02:14:21Z

New page

{{ncsbook menu|infothy|ratelim}}
This page is intended to be used for comments on Chapter 4 - Markovian Jump Linear Systems. To enter a new comment, create a new third level heading with your name and date. Then enter comments below and people can respond/converse.

=== RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 ===

# Notation differs from Chapter 2 and notation chapter. Using r(k) instead of r_k. OK for now, but eventually we will need to standardize.
# Use example environment for examples (this will generate the proper header + end of example marks)
# I would suggest that we don't use the acronym MJLS, but rather write out "Markovian jump linear system". The exception would be if you actually say "MJLS" when you talk about a Markovian jump linear system (like we say "LTI").
# The form of the theorems in this chapter is a bit awkward. They are very long and have itemized lists. I would remove the latter (use enumerated lists if necessary) and see if we can arrange things so that the proof statements are much shorter (using appropriate definitions, lemmas, etc) if that helps.
# Not sure if we need to include H_infty control, but leave as a placeholderer for now.