Ncsbook/estim - Revision history

Shiling: /* 30 Jul 09 telecon */

2009-08-04T05:46:07Z

30 Jul 09 telecon

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 4 August 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Comments on this chapter from 30 Jul 09 telecon:		Comments on this chapter from 30 Jul 09 telecon:

	** Changed/added/fixed by Ling		---Changed/added/fixed by Ling----------
	* Notation: covariance - \Sigma_{		* Notation: covariance - \Sigma_{
	* Notation: label equations as a group		* Notation: label equations as a group
Line 34:		Line 34:
	* Lyapunov and Ricatti operators: h, g, g^n, h^n		* Lyapunov and Ricatti operators: h, g, g^n, h^n

			---to be changed/added/fixed-------------
	* Think through notation for sets (currently A, B, etc)		* Think through notation for sets (currently A, B, etc)
	* Notation: use \mathbb E for expectation		* Notation: use \mathbb E for expectation
	* Discrete time noise - check derivation		* Discrete time noise - check derivation
	* Notation: * for messy expressions		* Notation: * for messy expressions

Shiling: /* 30 Jul 09 telecon */

2009-08-04T05:45:08Z

30 Jul 09 telecon

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 === 30 Jul 09 telecon ===
 Comments on this chapter from 30 Jul 09 telecon:
 * Think through notation for sets (currently A, B, etc)
 * Notation: use \mathbb E for expectation
 * Discrete time noise - check derivation
 * Notation: * for messy expressions

Murray at 22:56, 31 July 2009

2009-07-31T22:56:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 31 July 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:
	# To be arranged.		# To be arranged.
	# Changed to equation (xxx).		# Changed to equation (xxx).

			=== 30 Jul 09 telecon ===
			Comments on this chapter from 30 Jul 09 telecon:
			* Think through notation for sets (currently A, B, etc)
			* Notation: use \mathbb E for expectation
			* Notation: covariance - \Sigma_{
			* Notation: dx/dt = Ax + B u for continuous derivative
			* Discrete time noise - check derivation
			* Notation: label equations as a group
			* Notation: * for messy expressions
			* Notation: sort out notation for transpose (probably ^T)
			* Direct term: mention that we are not include this
			* Lyapunov and Ricatti operators: h, g, g^n, h^n

Shiling: /* RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 */

2009-06-21T02:02:08Z

RMM comments, 15 Jun 09

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 21 June 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	# We need to sort out whether the decentralized Kalman filter belongs in this chapter or in the distributed estimation chapter. I feel like it will make more sense in the later chapter, since it is really not "background" information.		# We need to sort out whether the decentralized Kalman filter belongs in this chapter or in the distributed estimation chapter. I feel like it will make more sense in the later chapter, since it is really not "background" information.
	# We need to decide how to refer to equations in the text. I usually write equation (1), which I feel is easier to read than Eqn. 1. I also like to put parenthesis around the equation number (use \eqref for this) since that matches the way the label appears in the text.		# We need to decide how to refer to equations in the text. I usually write equation (1), which I feel is easier to read than Eqn. 1. I also like to put parenthesis around the equation number (use \eqref for this) since that matches the way the label appears in the text.

			=== LS replies, 21 Jun 09 ===

			# Have changed the outline of Ch2 and added an intro section.
			# Removed proof for Thm 2.2.
			# Removed the whole section on Luenberger.
			# Added input to KF.
			# Changed to capital letters only.
			# To be arranged.
			# Changed to equation (xxx).

Murray at 02:07, 17 June 2009

2009-06-17T02:07:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 17 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ncsbook menu}}		{{ncsbook menu\|intro\|infothy}}
	This page is intended to be used for comments on Chapter 2 - State Estimation. To enter a new comment, create a new third level heading with your name and date. Then enter comments below and people can respond/converse.		This page is intended to be used for comments on Chapter 2 - State Estimation. To enter a new comment, create a new third level heading with your name and date. Then enter comments below and people can respond/converse.

Murray at 01:00, 17 June 2009

2009-06-17T01:00:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 17 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{ncsbook menu}}
	This page is intended to be used for comments on Chapter 2 - State Estimation. To enter a new comment, create a new third level heading with your name and date. Then enter comments below and people can respond/converse.		This page is intended to be used for comments on Chapter 2 - State Estimation. To enter a new comment, create a new third level heading with your name and date. Then enter comments below and people can respond/converse.

Murray at 00:59, 17 June 2009

2009-06-17T00:59:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 17 June 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	# Need an intro to the chapter that summarizes what will be presented in this chapter and how it fits into the book (background chapter, etc).		# Need an intro to the chapter that summarizes what will be presented in this chapter and how it fits into the book (background chapter, etc).

	# For proofs, I think we should either include the proof or just say before/after the theorem statement that the proof is available in the literature and give some citations. So remove the proof environment for Thm 2.2.		# For proofs, I think we should either include the proof or just say before/after the theorem statement that the proof is available in the literature and give some citations. So remove the proof environment for Thm 2.2.

	# Karl Astrom told me that a "Luenberger" observer is a ''reduced order'' observer and not just a state estimator. If we keep this section, we should check on the naming.		# Karl Astrom told me that a "Luenberger" observer is a ''reduced order'' observer and not just a state estimator. If we keep this section, we should check on the naming.
	#* In the conference call, Vijay made the point that we probably don't need this section. Just stick with the Kalman filter. --[[User:Murray\|Richard Murray]] 17:59, 16 June 2009 (PDT)		#* In the conference call, Vijay made the point that we probably don't need this section. Just stick with the Kalman filter. --[[User:Murray\|Richard Murray]] 17:59, 16 June 2009 (PDT)

	# Throughout this chapter, I think we need to add inputs. We'll need this in the TCP/UDP case.		# Throughout this chapter, I think we need to add inputs. We'll need this in the TCP/UDP case.

	# I'm not a huge fan of using '''bold''' symbols (eg, '''Yk''' for the vector of y's). I think it is fine to just use a capital letter, without changing the font. Probably OK to leave for now and we can hash it out later.		# I'm not a huge fan of using '''bold''' symbols (eg, '''Yk''' for the vector of y's). I think it is fine to just use a capital letter, without changing the font. Probably OK to leave for now and we can hash it out later.

	# We need to sort out whether the decentralized Kalman filter belongs in this chapter or in the distributed estimation chapter. I feel like it will make more sense in the later chapter, since it is really not "background" information.		# We need to sort out whether the decentralized Kalman filter belongs in this chapter or in the distributed estimation chapter. I feel like it will make more sense in the later chapter, since it is really not "background" information.

	# We need to decide how to refer to equations in the text. I usually write equation (1), which I feel is easier to read than Eqn. 1. I also like to put parenthesis around the equation number (use \eqref for this) since that matches the way the label appears in the text.		# We need to decide how to refer to equations in the text. I usually write equation (1), which I feel is easier to read than Eqn. 1. I also like to put parenthesis around the equation number (use \eqref for this) since that matches the way the label appears in the text.

Murray at 00:59, 17 June 2009

2009-06-17T00:59:32Z

New page

This page is intended to be used for comments on Chapter 2 - State Estimation. To enter a new comment, create a new third level heading with your name and date. Then enter comments below and people can respond/converse.

=== RMM comments, 15 Jun 09 ===

# Need an intro to the chapter that summarizes what will be presented in this chapter and how it fits into the book (background chapter, etc).

# For proofs, I think we should either include the proof or just say before/after the theorem statement that the proof is available in the literature and give some citations. So remove the proof environment for Thm 2.2.

# Karl Astrom told me that a "Luenberger" observer is a ''reduced order'' observer and not just a state estimator. If we keep this section, we should check on the naming.
#* In the conference call, Vijay made the point that we probably don't need this section. Just stick with the Kalman filter. --[[User:Murray|Richard Murray]] 17:59, 16 June 2009 (PDT)

# Throughout this chapter, I think we need to add inputs. We'll need this in the TCP/UDP case.

# I'm not a huge fan of using '''bold''' symbols (eg, '''Yk''' for the vector of y's). I think it is fine to just use a capital letter, without changing the font. Probably OK to leave for now and we can hash it out later.

# We need to sort out whether the decentralized Kalman filter belongs in this chapter or in the distributed estimation chapter. I feel like it will make more sense in the later chapter, since it is really not "background" information.

# We need to decide how to refer to equations in the text. I usually write equation (1), which I feel is easier to read than Eqn. 1. I also like to put parenthesis around the equation number (use \eqref for this) since that matches the way the label appears in the text.