Murray Wiki - User contributions [en]

Group Schedule, Summer 2018

2018-06-13T17:27:45Z

Haesaert:

This page contains information about various upcoming events that are of interest to the group. __NOTOC__
{| width=60%
|- valign=top
| width=50% |
* [[Schedule|Richard's calendar (travel)]]
| width=50% |
* [[Group Schedule, Spring 2018]]
|}

The schedule for group and subgroup meetings is given below. Contact Richard if you need to change the schedule. Unless otherwise noted, here are the locations of the meetings:

:{| width=100%
|- valign=top
| width=30% |
* Biocircuits subgroup - 111 Keck
| width=30% |
* NCS subgroup - 110 Steele
| width=30% |
* Group meetings - 213 ANB
|}

{| width=100% border=1
|- valign=top

| width=25% |
=== Week 1: 18-22 Jun ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1PKkv09_Z-82mG_fuWaMjCmsQg8KzieEh4dJHAyyJfVk|Individual updates]]a


| width=25% |

=== Week 2: 25-29 Jun ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* David Ortega
* John McManus
'''NCS: Mon, 1:30p-3p''' Steele 114
* Bastian Schurmann


| width=25% |

=== Week 3: 2 Jul-6 Jul ===
Richard out all week


| width=25% |

=== Week 4: 9-13 Jul ===
'''Biocircuits: Fri, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_4ajUuGyIscNKrLYiM3kQqlWCk3JsE8fB9VT4-7mIA8|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: Fri, 1:30p-3p'''
* Tung Phan


|- valign=top
| width=25% |

=== Week 5: 16-20 Jul ===
'''Biocircuits: Fri, 10a-12p'''
* Andrey Shur
* SURF talks: Sannat, Harman


| width=25% |

=== Week 6: 23-27 Jul ===
'''Biocircuits: Wed, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ONLJywVLuiv2b48QR-8u1F9rik2EdpnvUbDg3CwAK1I|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: Wed, 1:30p-3p'''
* Sofie Haesaert


| width=25% |

=== Week 7: 30 Jul-3 Aug ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* Samuel Clamons
* Reed McCardell


| width=25% |

=== Week 8: 6-10 Aug ===
'''NCS: Tue, 10:30a-12p'''
* Jin Ge
'''Biocircuits: Tue, 1p-3p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2oj3qciIcx--jqq2zifproF2kg6NWRMsH33QamI7hk|Individual updates]]


|- valign=top
| width=25% |

=== Week 9: 13-17 Aug ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* SURF talks: Sanjana K, Emanuel F, Leah K, Elin L
'''NCS: Tue, 10:30a-12p'''
* SURF talks: Rebecka W, Steve G, Filip K


| width=25% |

=== Week 10: 20-24 Aug ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p''' (tentative)
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1e4nEzsjAWnDexNCqMGOLh3YlfNIeccGm2IkPKey4Fys|Individual updates]]


| width=25% |

=== Week 11: 27-31 Aug ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* Cindy Ren
* Michaelle Mayalu
'''NCS: Mon, 12:30p-2p'''
* Ioannis Filippidis


| width=25% |

=== Week 12: 3-7 Sep ===
* Richard out all week


|- valign=top
| width=25% |
=== Week 13: 10-14 Sep ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1I9FkgZz4g11_EkbFdggEGbkuQmMrEDq0dElHNeywLl8|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: Tue, 10:30a-12p'''
* Note: meeting might shift to Mon @ 1:30 pm
* Petter Nilsson


| width=25% |

=== Week 14: 17-21 Sep ===
* Richard out all week


| width=25% |
=== Week 15: 24-28 Sep ===
'''Biocircuits: Fri, 10a-12p''' (tentative)
* William Poole
* Zoila Jurado
'''NCS: Fri, 1:30p-3p''' (tentative)
* Sumanth Dathathri


| width=25% |
|}

Group Schedule, Spring 2018

2018-04-02T18:52:32Z

Haesaert:

This page contains information about various upcoming events that are of interest to the group. __NOTOC__
{| width=60%
|- valign=top
| width=50% |
* [[Schedule|Richard's calendar (travel)]]
| width=50% |
* [[Group Schedule, Fall 2017]]
|}

The schedule for group and subgroup meetings is given below. Contact Richard if you need to change the schedule. Unless otherwise noted, here are the locations of the meetings:

:{| width=100%
|- valign=top
| width=30% |
* Biocircuits subgroup - 111 Keck
| width=30% |
* NCS subgroup - 110 Steele
| width=30% |
* Group meetings - 213 ANB
|}

{| width=100% border=1
|- valign=top

| width=25% |
=== Week 1: 2-6 Apr ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1sCvRNpzPMSvnvMZR97T3KuQGZz3GSuFmiMsa8raS4Po|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: Tue, <s>4p</s> 4:15p-5:30p'''
* Petter Nilsson


| width=25% |

=== Week 2: 9-13 Apr ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* Leo
* Ania
'''NCS: Tue, 1:30p-3p'''
* Jin


| width=25% |
=== Week 3: 16-20 Apr ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JO3XNnE3o1VT1qE59F01fJvuLADUTvnqJTKU_EYwInQ|Individual updates]]


| width=25% |

=== Week 4: 23-27 Apr ===
'''Biocircuits: Tue, 10a-12p'''
* James
* Vipul
'''NCS: Tue, 3p-4:30p'''
* Sofie


|- valign=top
| width=25% |
=== Week 5: 30 Apr - 4 May ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WziwwXnBtzfP5KFvEZtA6szPtYQvKHHVJaSVAHM15Mw|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: Tue, 1:30p-3p'''
* Ioannis


| width=25% |

=== Week 6: 7-11 May ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* Mark
* Anandh
'''NCS: Tue, 1:30p-3p'''
* Sumanth


| width=25% |
=== Week 7: 14-18 May ===
'''Biocircuits: Wed, 10a-12p'''
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_muCQXL51vE3KZmD6DsKcb3yOCroplzTK59w4ZVvm6g|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: <s>Thu, 1:30p-3p</s> Wed, 1:30p-3p, Steele 114'''
* Richard C


| width=25% |

=== Week 8: 21-25 May ===
* Richard out of town


|- valign=top
| width=25% |
=== Week 9: 28 May - 1 Jun ===
* Richard out of town


| width=25% |
=== Week 10: 4-8 Jun ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p''' (tentative)
* [[http:docs.google.com/presentation/d/1m9JXonM5YYcxlukVsAY1cs7tkiBKmFVhbpF3j-K-pwU|Individual updates]]
'''NCS: Mon, 1:30p-3p (tentative), 114 Steele'''
* Nikhil/Bose


| width=25% |

=== Week 11: 11-15 Jun ===
'''Biocircuits: Mon, 10a-12p'''
* David Ortega
* Jan Gregrowicz
* John Marken
'''NCS: Mon, 1:30p-3p, 114 Steele'''
* Karena


| width=25% |
|}

SURF discussions, Jan 2018

2018-01-24T08:01:32Z

Haesaert: /* 25 Jan (Thu) */

Slots for talking with applicants and co-mentors about SURF projects. Please sign up for one of the slots below. All times are PST. __NOTOC__

In preparation for our conversation, please do the following:
* SURF students should work with their co-mentors to find a time the meeting/Skype call. (For Skype calls, co-mentors should initiate.)
* Please make sure you have read the material in the description of your project, so that you are prepared to talk about what the project is about and we can narrow in on the key ideas that will be the basis of your proposal
* Please take a look at the [[SURF GOTChA chart]] page, which is the format that we will use for the first iteration of your project proposal.

{| border=1
|- valign=top
| width=25% |
==== 23 Jan (Tue) ====
* 1:00 pm PST: open
<hr>
* 4:00 pm PST: Andrey/ Sanjana
<hr>
* 6:00 pm PST: Andy/Emanuel
* 6:30 pm PST: Michaelle/Harman
| width=25% |

==== 24 Jan (Wed) ====
* 7:30 am PST: William/Sannat
* 8:00 am PST: Rory/Elin
<hr>
*12:15 pm PST: Filip / Jin
<hr>
* 4:30 pm PST: Reed / Leah
* 5:00 pm PST: Steve & Tung

| width=25% |
==== 25 Jan (Thu) ====
* 8:00 am PST: open
* 8:30 am PST: open
* 9:00 am PST: open
* 9:30 am PST: Sofie/ Rebecka

| width=25% |

==== 26 Jan (Fri) ====
* 10:00 am PST: open
* 10:30 am PST: open
|}

The agenda for the phone call is (roughly):

# Description of the basic idea behind the project (based on applicant's understanding)
# Discussion about approaches, things to read, variations to consider, etc
# Discussion of the format of the proposal
# Questions and discussion about the process

SURF discussions, Jan 2018

2018-01-23T18:36:39Z

Haesaert:

Slots for talking with applicants and co-mentors about SURF projects. Please sign up for one of the slots below. All times are PST. __NOTOC__

In preparation for our conversation, please do the following:
* SURF students should work with their co-mentors to find a time the meeting/Skype call. (For Skype calls, co-mentors should initiate.)
* Please make sure you have read the material in the description of your project, so that you are prepared to talk about what the project is about and we can narrow in on the key ideas that will be the basis of your proposal
* Please take a look at the [[SURF GOTChA chart]] page, which is the format that we will use for the first iteration of your project proposal.

{| border=1
|- valign=top
| width=30% |
==== 23 Jan (Tue) ====
* 1:00 pm PST: open
<hr>
* 4:00 pm PST: Andrey/ Sanjana
<hr>
* 6:00 pm PST: Andy/Emanuel
* 6:30 pm PST: Michaelle/Harman
| width=30% |

==== 24 Jan (Wed) ====
* 7:30 am PST: William/Sannat
* 8:00 am PST: Rory/Elin
<hr>
*12:15 pm PST: Filip / Jin
*12:45 pm PST: Rebecka / Sofie
<hr>
* 4:30 pm PST: Reed / Leah
* 5:00 pm PST: open
* 5:30 pm PST: Steve & Tung
|}

The agenda for the phone call is (roughly):

# Description of the basic idea behind the project (based on applicant's understanding)
# Discussion about approaches, things to read, variations to consider, etc
# Discussion of the format of the proposal
# Questions and discussion about the process

SURF 2018: Test design for temporal logic controllers

2017-12-16T07:06:57Z

Haesaert:

'''[[SURF 2018|2018 SURF]]: project description'''
* Mentor: Richard M. Murray
* Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert

The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such
as autonomous vehicles, intelligent robots, and cyber-physical infrastructures,
demands guarantees on their correct and reliable behavior.
Correct functioning and reliability over models of systems
can be attained by the use of temporal logics in the specification and design of their controllers [1].
The use such formal methods carries the promise of a decrease in design
faults and implementation errors.

In practice, for most physical systems the dynamical behavior is known only in part: this holds
in particular with biological systems
or with classes of engineered systems where, as a consequence,
the use of uncertain control models built from data is a common
practice [2].
Since these data-driven models are an empirical approximation it is important to test the designed controllers before implementation. The design of experiments that allows for the verification of formal properties can be formulated as an stochastic optimal control problem [3].

In this study the objective is to research smart ways of testing these temporal logic controllers. By looking at the confidence in the modeling assumptions, we want to develop tests to optimally verify the robustness of the designed controlled systems.

Familiarity with the following topics is a bonus
* Classical control theory for discrete systems (or continuous)
* Data-driven modeling and experiment design
* Convex optimization in control theory

'''References'''

[1] Wongpiromsarn, T., Topcu, U., Ozay, N., Xu, H., & Murray, R. M. ``TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning." In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp. 313-314. ACM, 2011.

[2] Hjalmarsson, H. "From experiment design to closed-loop control." Automatica,
393–43, 2005.

[3] Haesaert, Sofie, Paul M.J. Van den Hof, and Alessandro Abate. "Experiment design for formal verification via stochastic optimal control." Control Conference (ECC), 2016 European. IEEE, 2016.

SURF 2018: Test design for temporal logic controllers

2017-12-16T07:05:37Z

Haesaert:

'''[[SURF 2018|2018 SURF]]: project description'''
* Mentor: Richard M. Murray
* Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert

The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such
as autonomous vehicles, intelligent robots, and cyber-physical infrastructures,
demands guarantees on their correct and reliable behavior.
Correct functioning and reliability over models of systems
can be attained by the use of temporal logics in the specification and design of their controllers [1].
The use such formal methods carries the promise of a decrease in design
faults and implementation errors.

In practice, for most physical systems the dynamical behavior is known only in part: this holds
in particular with biological systems
or with classes of engineered systems where, as a consequence,
the use of uncertain control models built from data is a common
practice [2].
Since these data-driven models are an empirical approximation it is important to test the designed controllers before implementation. The design of experiments that allows for the verification of formal properties can be formulated as an stochastic optimal control problem [3].

In this study the objective is to research smart ways of testing these temporal logic controllers. By looking at the confidence in the modeling assumptions, we want to develop tests to optimally verify the robustness of the designed controlled systems.

Familiarity with the following topics is a bonus
* Classical control theory for discrete systems (or continuous)
* Data-driven modeling and experiment design
* Convex optimization in control theory

'''References'''

[1] Wongpiromsarn, T., Topcu, U., Ozay, N., Xu, H., \& Murray, R. M. ``TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning." In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp. 313-314. ACM, 2011.

[2] Hjalmarsson, H. "From experiment design to closed-loop control." Automatica,
393–43, 2005.

[3] Haesaert, Sofie, Paul M.J. Van den Hof, and Alessandro Abate. "Experiment design for formal verification via stochastic optimal control." Control Conference (ECC), 2016 European. IEEE, 2016.

SURF 2018: Test design for temporal logic controllers

2017-12-16T07:05:06Z

Haesaert:

'''[[SURF 2018|2018 SURF]]: project description'''
* Mentor: Richard M. Murray
* Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert

The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such
as autonomous vehicles, intelligent robots, and cyber-physical infrastructures,
demands guarantees on their correct and reliable behavior.
Correct functioning and reliability over models of systems
can be attained by the use of temporal logics in the specification and design of their controllers [1].
The use such formal methods carries the promise of a decrease in design
faults and implementation errors.

In practice, for most physical systems the dynamical behavior is known only in part: this holds
in particular with biological systems
or with classes of engineered systems where, as a consequence,
the use of uncertain control models built from data is a common
practice [2].
Since these data-driven models are an empirical approximation it is important to test the designed controllers before implementation. The design of experiments that allows for the verification of formal properties can be formulated as an stochastic optimal control problem [3].

In this study the objective is to research smart ways of testing these controllers. By looking at the confidence in the modeling assumptions, we want to develop tests to optimally verify the robustness of the designed controlled systems.

Familiarity with the following topics is a bonus
* Classical control theory for discrete systems (or continuous)
* Data-driven modeling and experiment design
* Convex optimization in control theory

'''References'''

[1] Wongpiromsarn, T., Topcu, U., Ozay, N., Xu, H., \& Murray, R. M. ``TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning." In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp. 313-314. ACM, 2011.

[2] Hjalmarsson, H. "From experiment design to closed-loop control." Automatica,
393–43, 2005.

[3] Haesaert, Sofie, Paul M.J. Van den Hof, and Alessandro Abate. "Experiment design for formal verification via stochastic optimal control." Control Conference (ECC), 2016 European. IEEE, 2016.

SURF 2018: Test design for temporal logic controllers

2017-12-16T07:04:24Z

Haesaert:

'''[[SURF 2018|2018 SURF]]: project description'''
* Mentor: Richard M. Murray
* Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert

The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such
as autonomous vehicles, intelligent robots, and cyber-physical infrastructures,
demands guarantees on their correct and reliable behavior.
Correct functioning and reliability over models of systems
can be attained by the use of temporal logics in the specification and design of their controllers [1].
The use such formal methods carries the promise of a decrease in design
faults and implementation errors.

In practice, for most physical systems the dynamical behavior is known only in part: this holds
in particular with biological systems
or with classes of engineered systems where, as a consequence,
the use of uncertain control models built from data is a common
practice [2].
Since these data-driven models are an empirical approximation it is important to test the designed controllers before implementation. The design of experiments that allows for the verification of formal properties can be formulated as an stochastic optimal control problem [3].

In this study the objective is to research smart ways of testing these controllers. By looking at the confidence in the modeling assumptions, we want to develop tests to optimally verify the robustness of the designed controlled systems.

Familiarity with the following topics is a bonus
* Classical control theory for discrete systems (or continuous)
* Data-driven modeling and experiment design
* Convex optimization in control theory

'''References'''

[1] Wongpiromsarn, T., Topcu, U., Ozay, N., Xu, H., \& Murray, R. M. ``TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning." In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp. 313-314. ACM, 2011.

[2] Hjalmarsson, H. (2005). "From experiment design to closed-loop control." Automatica,
393–43

[3] Haesaert, Sofie, Paul M.J. Van den Hof, and Alessandro Abate. "Experiment design for formal verification via stochastic optimal control." Control Conference (ECC), 2016 European. IEEE, 2016.

SURF 2018: Test design for temporal logic controllers

2017-12-16T07:03:06Z

Haesaert:

'''[[SURF 2018|2018 SURF]]: project description'''
* Mentor: Richard M. Murray
* Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert

The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such
as autonomous vehicles, intelligent robots, and cyber-physical infrastructures,
demands guarantees on their correct and reliable behavior.
Correct functioning and reliability over models of systems
can be attained by the use of temporal logics in the specification and design of their controllers [1].
The use such formal methods carries the promise of a decrease in design
faults and implementation errors.

In practice, for most physical systems the dynamical behavior is known only in part: this holds
in particular with biological systems
or with classes of engineered systems where, as a consequence,
the use of uncertain control models built from data is a common
practice [2].
Since these data-driven models are an empirical approximation it is important to test the designed controllers for these physical system before implementation. The design of experiments that allow for the verification of formal properties can be formulated as an stochastic optimal control problem [3].

In this study the objective is to research smart ways of testing these controllers. By looking at the confidence in the modeling assumptions, we want to develop tests to optimally verify the robustness of the designed controlled systems.

Familiarity with the following topics is a bonus
* Classical control theory for discrete systems (or continuous)
* Data-driven modeling and experiment design
* Convex optimization in control theory

'''References'''
[1] Wongpiromsarn, T., Topcu, U., Ozay, N., Xu, H., \& Murray, R. M. ``TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning." In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp. 313-314. ACM, 2011.

[2] Hjalmarsson, H. (2005). "From experiment design to closed-loop control." Automatica,
393–43

[3] Haesaert, Sofie, Paul M.J. Van den Hof, and Alessandro Abate. "Experiment design for formal verification via stochastic optimal control." Control Conference (ECC), 2016 European. IEEE, 2016.

SURF 2018: Test design for temporal logic controllers

2017-12-16T07:02:17Z

Haesaert: Created page with "'''2018 SURF: project description''' * Mentor: Richard M. Murray * Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such as a..."

'''[[SURF 2018|2018 SURF]]: project description'''
* Mentor: Richard M. Murray
* Co-mentor: Sofie Haesaert

The design of complex, high-tech, safety-critical systems such
as autonomous vehicles, intelligent robots, and cyber-physical infrastructures,
demands guarantees on their correct and reliable behavior.
Correct functioning and reliability over models of systems
can be attained by the use of temporal logics in the specification and design of their controllers [1].
The use such formal methods carries the promise of a decrease in design
faults and implementation errors. %and of correct-by-design synthesis.
In practice, for most physical
systems the dynamical behavior is known only in part: this holds
in particular with biological systems
or with classes of engineered systems where, as a consequence,
the use of uncertain control models built from data is a common
practice [2].
Since these data-driven models are an empirical approximation it is important to test the designed controllers for these physical system before implementation. The design of experiments that allow for the verification of formal properties can be formulated as an stochastic optimal control problem [3].

In this study the objective is to research smart ways of testing these controllers. By looking at the confidence in the modeling assumptions, we want to develop tests to optimally verify the robustness of the designed controlled systems.

Familiarity with the following topics is a bonus
* Classical control theory for discrete systems (or continuous)
* Data-driven modeling and experiment design
* Convex optimization in control theory

'''References'''
[1] Wongpiromsarn, T., Topcu, U., Ozay, N., Xu, H., \& Murray, R. M. ``TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning." In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control, pp. 313-314. ACM, 2011.
[2] Hjalmarsson, H. (2005). "From experiment design to closed-loop control." Automatica,
393–43
[3] Haesaert, Sofie, Paul M.J. Van den Hof, and Alessandro Abate. "Experiment design for formal verification via stochastic optimal control." Control Conference (ECC), 2016 European. IEEE, 2016.

Karan Kalsi, Oct 2017

2017-10-01T21:36:52Z

Haesaert: /* Schedule for Karan Kalsi visit, 2-5 Oct 2017 */

__NOTOC__
[[Image:Karan_Kalsi.jpg||right]]
Dr. Karan Kalsi is currently a power systems research engineer at the Pacific Northwest National Lab, Richland, WA, USA. He is the lead investigator on Department of Energy funded research to develop efficient, reliable and secure control strategies for Smart Grid assets. He is the principle investigator on the topic of developing future power grid control paradigms as part of the laboratory’s Future Power Grid Initiative. He is the Co-principle investigator on EED SEED project related to modeling and controls for distributed energy resources in microgrids. Karanjit is also actively involved with IEEE including being the 2011 Chair of the IEEE Richland Section Graduates of the Last Decade (GOLD) Affinity Group and was recently elected as the 2012 Vice-chair of Technical Activities and Outreach of the IEEE Richland Section Power and Energy Society.

More: http://energyenvironment.pnnl.gov/staff/staff_info.asp?staff_num=2178

== Schedule for Karan Kalsi visit, 2-5 Oct 2017 ==

=== 2 Oct (Mon) ===
* Morning: HR check-in, office setup
* Lunch: Richard
* 1:30 pm: Open
* 2:30 pm: Sofie Haesaert (Annenberg 310)
* 3:30 pm: Colloqium reception (location?)
* 4 pm: CMS colloqium - George Papanicoulou (Stanford), 105 Annenberg

=== 3 Oct (Tue) ===
* 9:30 am: Open
* 10:15 am: Tony Fragoso (Annenberg 3rd floor treehouse lounge)
* 11 am: Aaron Ames (266 Gates-Thomas)
* IST lunch bunch
* Afternoon off

=== 4 Oct (Wed) ===
* Morning off
* Lunch open
* 3 pm: CDS tea
* 4 pm: Open
* 4:45 pm: Open

=== 5 Oct (Thu) ===
* 10 am: Soon-Jo Chung (235 Guggenheim) CAST and aerospace robotics research
* 11 am: Ioannis Filippidis (330 Annenberg)
* Lunch: Open
* 2 pm: head for airport

Bozenna Pasik-Duncan, Sep 2017

2017-09-27T03:59:20Z

Haesaert:

[[Image:duncan_bozenna.jpg|right]]
Bozenna Pasik-Duncan is a Professor of Mathematics at the University of Kansas. Her research interests are primarily in stochastic systems and stochastic adaptive control, system identification and estimation, and control education as a field that spans science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education.

Dr. Pasik-Duncan is actively involved with IEEE CSS and currently serves as Deputy Chair of the IEEE CSS Technical Committee on Control Education. She has been the CSS Vice-President of Member Activities, the IEEE CSS Liaison to IEEE WIE, an Associate Editor and Associate Editor at Large of the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Chair of the Standing Committees on Assistance of Engineers at Risk and International Affairs, and Founder and First Chair of the WiC Group. Dr. Pasik-Duncan is also associated with the IFAC as Chair of the IFAC Technical Committee on Control Education and currently serves on the IFAC Technical Board and IFAC Awards Committee. She is the Program Director of the SIAM Activity Group on Control and Systems Theory and was formerly involved with SIAM in several other capacities.

Dr. Pasik-Duncan is an IFAC Fellow, an IEEE Fellow, Distinguished Member of the CSS, and a recipient of the IEEE Third Millennium Medal. She has received many awards, including the Kemper Award, H.O.P.E Award, L. Hay Award, Steeples Service to Kansas Award and is a member of the KU Women's Hall of Fame. She served on the Friends of the Lied Center Board and currently serves on the SMA Academic Program Advisory Board. She is Founder and Faculty Advisor to the AWM Student Chapter at KU, Founder and Coordinator of the MAM / Outreach Program, and faculty advisor for the NSF GK-12 Program at KU.

=== Schedule ===

* 1:00 pm: Biocircuits lab tour, Anandh Swaminathan (meet in 107 Steele)
* 1:30 pm: Karena Cai (Anandh to take Bozenna to Karena's office)
* 2:00 pm: Ania Baetica (Karena to take Bozenna to Ania's office)
* 2:30 pm: John Doyle, 210 Annenberg
* 3:00 pm: CDS tea
* 3:45 pm: Sofie Haesaert, 310 Annenberg
* 4:15 pm: Open (fill last)
* 4:45 pm: Done for the day

May 2017 meeting schedule

2017-05-10T01:33:44Z

Haesaert: /* 21 May (Sun) */

Richard will be in town several different times in May. Please sign up for a time to meet below. Please note that these are likely the last "sabbatical" meetings until Richard returns to Pasadena in early July. __NOTOC__

{| border=1 width=100%
|- valign=top
| width=33% |
| width=33% |
==== 15 May (Mon) ====
* 9:30 am: Open
* 10:15 am: Open
* 11:00 am: Faculty meeting
* 11:30 am: Andy
* 12:15 pm: Lunch
* 1:30 pm: Sam
* 2:15 pm: Reed
* 3:00 pm: Vipul
* 3:45 pm: Break
* 4:00 pm: Namita
* 4:45 pm: Ania
* 5:30 pm: Anandh
* 6:15 pm: Done for the day

| width=33% |

==== 16 May (Tue)====
* 9:30 am: Yong
* 10:15 am: Tung
* 11:00 am: Faculty meeting
* 12:00 pm: Lunch
* 1:30 pm: Depart
* 12:00 pm: Lunch
* 1:30 pm: Depart

|- valign=top
| width=33% |

====21 May (Sun) ====
* 1:45 pm: Sofie
* 2:30 pm: Ioannis
* 3:15 pm: Karena
* 4:00 pm: Break
* 4:15 pm: Open
* 5:00 pm: Open
* 5:45 pm: Open
* 6:30 pm: Done for the day

| width=33% |

==== 22 May (Mon) ====
* 10:15 am: Mark
* 11:00 am: Cindy
* 11:45 am: Lunch
* 12:00 pm: DARPA BioCon meeting
* 2:00 pm: Swati + Reed
* 2:45 pm: Off campus
* 4:15 pm: James
* 5:00 pm: Non-Caltech meetings
* 6:30 pm: Done for the day

| width=33% |

==== 23 May (Tue) ====
* 9:30 am: Faculty discussion
* 10:30 am: Hold (Susan)
* 11:30 am: Lunch
* 12:00 pm: Telecon
* 1:00 pm: Anu thesis defense
* 3:00 pm: Terri (?)
* 3:30 pm: Depart

|- valign=top
| width=33% |

====28 May (Sun) ====
* 1:45 pm: Richard C
* 2:30 pm: George
* 3:15 pm: Andy
* 4:00 pm: Done for the day
| width=33% |

====29 May (Mon) ====
* 1:45 pm: Open (if needed)
* 2:30 pm: Open (if needed)
* 3:15 pm: Sumanth
* 4:00 pm: Done for the day
| width=33% |

==== 30 May (Tue) ====
* 9:30 am: Shan
* 10:15 am: Shaobin
* 11:00 am: Stepan seminar
* 12:00 pm: Lunch
* 1:30 pm: Namita
* 2:15 pm: Andrey
* 3:00 pm: Depart
|}